US: 4 Americans killed in drone strikes

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration acknowledged for the first time Wednesday that four American citizens have been killed in drone strikes since 2009 in Pakistan and Yemen. The disclosure to Congress comes on the eve of a major national security speech by President Barack Obama.

In conducting U.S. counterterrorism operations against al-Qaida and its associated forces, the government has targeted and killed one American citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki, and is aware of the killing by U.S. drones of three others, Attorney General Eric Holder said in a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy.

Al-Awlaki, a radical Muslim cleric, was killed in a drone strike in September 2011 in Yemen. Holder said three other Americans were killed by drones in counterterrorism operations since 2009 but were not targeted. The three are Samir Khan, who was killed in the same drone strike as al-Awlaki; al-Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman, a native of Denver, who also was killed in Yemen two weeks later; and Jude Kenan Mohammed, who was killed in a drone strike in Pakistan.

“Since entering office, the president has made clear his commitment to providing Congress and the American people with as much information as possible about our sensitive counterterrorism operations,” Holder told Leahy, D-Vt. “To this end, the president has directed me to disclose certain information that until now has been properly classified.”

“The administration is determined to continue these extensive outreach efforts to communicate with the American people,” Holder wrote.

Article source: http://www.myfoxny.com/story/22398749/us-4-americans-killed-in-drone-strikes

Woolwich, Britain Attack Condemned by Muslims

Woolwich, Britain Attack Condemned by Muslims

British Muslims have taken to Twiter to denounce the Woolwich attack and to express their dismay that anyone could claim that such an act of brutality had anything to do with religion.  Representatives of many British Muslim organizations have condemned this terrible crime.

The Islamic Society of Britain has issued a statement:

Murdering a British soldier is an attack on our nation.  No effort should be spared in purging this hate.

Our thoughts and sympathies are with the family of the deceased.

Justifying this killing in the name of faith or religion is false and rejected.  Rejected by the Islamic Society of Britain.  Rejected by scripture.  Rejected by those who commit to God.  Rejected by civil society.  And rejected by truth.

We, the British, will remain together, resolute and strong.  And we will carry on.

The Muslim Council of Britain has released a statement which said it understood the victim was a member of the Armed Forces, and calling for communities to come together.  The statement said:

“This is a truly barbaric act that has no basis in Islam and we condemn this unreservedly.

“Our thoughts are with the victim and his family.

“We understand the victim is a serving member of the Armed Forces. Muslims have long served in this country’s Armed Forces, proudly and with honour.

“This attack on a member of the Armed Forces is dishonourable, and no cause justifies this murder. This action will no doubt heighten tensions on the streets of the United Kingdom.

“We call on all our communities, Muslim and non-Muslim, to come together in solidarity to ensure the forces of hatred do not prevail.”

The Islamic Forum of Europe issued a statement

The Islamic Forum of Europe condemns the shocking attack and murder of a soldier in London today. Although reports indicate the suspects are Muslim, there is no basis in Islam for such barbaric attacks.

The perpetrators may have had delusions of being martyrs for their faith, but the plain facts are they were violent criminals. They do not represent anyone but themselves. Such attacks are cowardly and without honour.

The thoughts of Muslims are with the victim’s family at this tragic time. We must all let the authorities get on with the task of investigating how this happened and let the perpetrators feel the full force of the law.

If you click on the Muslims Denounce Terrorism logo on the front page of The American Muslim, it will take you to Muslim Voices Against Extremism and Terrorism.  There is a great deal of information available through links on that page, including these very extensive collections:

A Spiritual Jihad Against Terrorism (5 parts), Sheila Musaji

Muslim Scholars Appeal to Christian Scholars for Dialogue and Peace – “A Common Word”, Sheila Musaji

Muslim Violence, Christian Non-Violence:  People in Glass Houses Should Not Throw Words, Sheila Musaji  

Muslim Voices Against Extremism and Terrorism

list of article collections and resources

- Part I II Fatwas Statements by Muslim Scholars Organizations against extremism and terrorism

- Part III Statements Articles by Individuals

- Part IV A few Quotes A-K, and L-Z

- Part V Muslim Voices Promoting Islamic Non Violent Solutions 

- Part VI Qur’an Hadith Against Extremism and Terrorism

- Part VII Selective Hearing of Muslim Voices Against Extremism and Terrorism 

- Part VIII Religious terrorism is an oxymoron, Sheila Musaji

- Part IX Throwing Stones at the Qur’an From a Biblical Glass House, Sheila Musaji

- Part X Claim that all terrorists are Muslims ignores history

- Part XI Hirabah – Jihad – Terrorism – Violence – Just War – Crusades article collection and resources from TAM and Loonwatch – updated 7/6/12

NOTE:  Very little is known about the perpetrators or their affiliations and motives at this time.  We don’t know what their nationality, or even whether they are lone wolves or part of some organized criminal gang like Al Qaeda.  This will be updated as facts become available.

ARTICLES on this particular act of terrorism:

A brave woman talked down Woolwich terrorists who told her: ‘We want to start a war in London tonight’  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/10074881/Mum-talked-down-Woolwich-terrorists-who-told-her-We-want-to-start-a-war-in-London-tonight.html

Anti-Muslim reprisals after Woolwich attack:  English Defence League in street battles with police in Woolwich and mosques attacked in apparent acts of revenge http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/23/woolwich-attack-anti-muslim-reprisals

Muslims condemn barbaric killing http://www.asianimage.co.uk/news/10436984.Muslims_condemn_barbaric_killing/?ref=nt

Muslims must not apologise for terror – they are no more responsible than the rest of us, Ian Dunt http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2013/05/22/comment-muslims-must-not-apologise-for-terror-they-are-no-mo

Woolwich Machete Attack: Muslim Religious Groups Condemn Killing http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/05/22/woolwich-machete-attack-religious-groups-condemn-killing_n_3322089.html?utm_hp_ref=uk?ncid=GEP

‘Not in our name’ – British Muslims denounce the Woolwich attack on Twitter http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/05/not-in-the-name-of-islam-british-muslims-denounce-the-woolwich-attack/

Woolwich attack: government convenes emergency meeting – live updates http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/22/woolwich-two-shot-in-police-incident-live-coverage

Woolwich attack: lone wolf and jihadist theories will occupy security forces http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/22/woolwich-attack-lone-wolf-jihadist

Article source: http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/woolwich-britain-attack-condemned-by-muslims/0019798

The Religion of Peace Strikes London Again

Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

I first found out about today’s terrorist attack in London via

Ross’ post
.

My first thought is that this isn’t the first act of Islamic
terrorism in Britain and it won’t be the last. 

It has been widely reported that the man who was murdered in
broad daylight was a British soldier. Sadly, American soldiers are
not unfamiliar with these types of attacks. There was the murder of
Private William Long
outside a military recruitment center in
Arkansas by a Muslim convert in June 2009. Abdulhakim Muhammad
(formerly known as Carlos Bledsoe) shouted
“Allahu Akbar”
as he was led into the courthouse. In March
2011,
two U.S. Airmen were shot dead
at the Frankfurt Airport by a
German born Muslim of Kosovar origin. The gunman shouted, “Allahu
Akbar” as he fired.

And lest we forget Fort Hood where Nidal Malik Hassan shouted
“Allahu Akbar” as he gunned down 12 military personnel and one
civilian. 

British Prime Minister David Cameron has
said
there are “strong indications that this is a terrorist
incident.” If this attack had occurred in the United States,
President Obama not only would not have described it as a terrorist
attack; he would have characterized it as streetplace violence.

Finally, a comment on Ross’ post itself. He concluded the post
by writing, “Time to start deporting Muslims from England.”

Unfortunately, it isn’t as simple as all that. At this point,
the two men who perpretrated this attack have yet to be identified.
When they are don’t be surprised if they were U.K. born and raised.
Let us not forget that three of the four men responsible for the
London Underground Bombings on July 7, 2005 were born in
Britain. 

This isn’t to say that unchecked immigration isn’t part of the
problem especially with clerics like Abu Qatada spreading jihad to
eager audiences in the U.K. The problem is that the U.K. has been
trying to deport Qatada without success for seven years. Qatada

may soon be deported to Jordan
 where he faces terrorism
charges but that was supposed to happen six years ago. So Lord only
knows if that will ever happen.

But even if Qatada is deported, their ideas and influence remain
amongst British Muslims regardless of where they were born and
regardless if they were born Muslim. The surest way to counter
these ideas would be the re-assertion of British values of liberty.
The problem is there may not be anyone in Britain willing to
re-assert those values. 

Article source: http://spectator.org/blog/2013/05/22/the-religion-of-peace-strikes

Muslims walk the extra mile for Boston

by Kiran Ansari

Chicago – When 30,000 people participated in Project Bread’s walk to eradicate hunger in Boston on 5 May, there was a group among them that was energised but cautious. Just three weeks after the tragedy at the Boston Marathon, members of Muslims Against Hunger were receiving calls from worried family members urging them not to participate due to fear of backlash.

Project Bread runs community-based meal programs and school nutrition initiatives that assist the hungry in Massachusetts. At their 45th Walk for Hunger this year, the organisation raised around $3 million. It was perfectly in sync with the objectives of Muslims Against Hunger, a grassroots organisation with volunteers in 20 cities that aims to mobilise the community to tackle hunger, poverty and homelessness. Approximately 150 Muslim participants raised over $5,000 for Project Bread.

A young mother of three children, Shazia Tariq from Westborough, Massachusetts was one of the Muslims walking for the cause. She had learned about Muslims Against Hunger through the soup kitchens that they regularly organise. An avid athlete, she had registered for the Project Bread Walk in March and had been training for the gruelling 20 mile trek. But after the horrific attacks on 15 April, her family, like that of many others, was worried that because she wears a headscarf she would be easily identifiable as a Muslim and cautioned she should sit this one out.

“The cause is very close to my heart,” Tariq said. “First as Muslims we believe that feeding our neighbours and feeding the hungry is a crucial part of our faith. Second, as a mother I am always telling my children how blessed they are to have a pantry full of food and this was my chance to put my words into action.” She found the resolve to participate and received her family’s blessing despite their initial anxieties.

After the Boston tragedy, a representative from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) came to speak to the Muslim community at the Worcester Islamic Center, where Tariq volunteers regularly. After the presentation on civil rights and tips on how to prevent and report backlash, she approached the CAIR Representative, Todd Gallinger, and asked him for his opinion. He reinforced her decision to carry on, calling it the perfect opportunity to dispel stereotypes about Muslim Americans.

“I had already made up my mind,” Tariq said. “But when Mr. Gallinger said that this is the perfect time to engage in interfaith activities and showcase all the positive contributions of Muslim Americans, it just solidified my intention. I would not be at peace by not going, especially since I was not afraid, it was just my loved ones that were worried for me.”

As she walked and ran the 20 miles with friends from the mosque, Tariq was cautious not to attract attention in any way. When she saw an exhausted eight-year old girl sitting on the sidelines, she felt like helping her over the finish line. But her gut instinct said that this was not the right time or place to be over-friendly as a stranger to the child. Instead Tariq brought the little girl oranges and shared a few words of encouragement. She was pleased to see the girl complete the walk a few feet ahead of her.

Tariq had originally wanted to participate in the Boston Marathon but was dealing with asthma during training season. She had planned to at least go and watch the marathon but was sick in bed on that sad day. As an athlete and a Bostonian, she felt she would be getting the best of both worlds by making the iconic Boston Marathon her first ever full marathon.

The Project Bread walk experience has motivated her to train for the Boston Marathon next year. She believes that when it comes to her personal goals, or encouraging her children in sports or academics, its important to push them, and herself, to achieve more. She feels there is a need to cultivate this enthusiasm in community service as well. When her kids were little, she felt they were keeping her back from volunteering in the community. But now she feels she has to do it for the kids because it can have a much bigger impact on their lives when they see her working for a cause rather than just lecturing them about it.

“When a couple in their 70′s can walk hand in hand and an eight-year old can cross the finish line, so can I,” Tariq said. “As Muslims, more of us need to get out of our bubble and directly help the needy, and I plan to continue going the extra mile for it.”

Kiran Ansari is a writer for publications including the Chicago Tribune, Daily Herald, Halal Consumer and Azizah Magazine. She lives with her husband and two children in the suburbs of Chicago. This article was written for the Common Ground News Service (CGNews).

Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 21 May 2013. Copyright permission is granted for publication.


Follow Common Ground News Service on Twitter:

www.twitter.com/CGNewsService

Article source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/common-ground-news-service/muslims-walk-the-extra-mi_b_3321814.html

NYPD messages to Muslim informant: "Get pictures"

ADAM GOLDMAN and MATT APUZZO, Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) — A New York Police Department detective told a federal judge that he’s seen no evidence that one of his informants brought up the subject of jihad as a way to bait Muslims into making incriminating remarks. But text messages obtained by The Associated Press show otherwise.

And while the detective, Stephen Hoban, described the activities in a new legal filing in U.S. District Court as narrowly focused on a few people under investigation, text messages show a wide-ranging effort. Eager to make money, Shamiur Rahman, the informant, snapped pictures during prayer sessions, rallies and a parade; recorded the names of people who signed petitions or protested; and reported fellow Muslims who volunteered to feed needy families.

When the detective responded, his text messages nearly always sought more information:

“Did you take pictures?”

“I need pictures from the rally. And I need to know who is there.”

“Get pictures”

Rahman told the AP last year that he made about $9,000 over nine months spying widely on friends and others. He said the NYPD encouraged him to use a tactic called “create and capture.” He said it involved creating conversations about jihad or terrorism, then capturing the responses and sending them to the NYPD.

Now, as the NYPD defends itself from allegations by civil rights lawyers that such tactics violated a longstanding federal court order, the department said Rahman was either lying or didn’t know what he was talking about.

“Rahman was never tasked to, nor did he as far as I know, engage in what he refers to as a ‘create and capture’ methodology,” Hoban wrote. “There are 57 field reports documenting Rahman’s work as an informant. In reviewing those field reports, it is clear that Rahman did not use what he refers to in his declaration as a ‘create and capture’ strategy.”

Rahman allowed the AP to review months of text messages with Hoban from January to September 2012.

“Hey bro,” Rahman told Hoban in one message. “I think im going to bring up jihad with these guys tonight, see what they say and know and then go home because everyones really just praying and stuff.”

Hoban did not respond to that message. Rahman previously said his NYPD handler only encouraged him to use the tactic, never dissuaded him. Rahman did not respond to messages for comment from AP after Hoban’s filing in federal court in Manhattan.

The different accounts of Rahman’s activities are significant. Taken with the NYPD’s use of plainclothes detectives assigned to the Demographics Unit to catalog Muslim business and eavesdrop on conversations, civil rights lawyers say that Rahman’s tactics show the NYPD is violating court-imposed rules about what files it can keep on activities protected by the First Amendment.

The NYPD strongly denies that and Hoban’s affidavit is central to their defense.

The NYPD’s court papers also reveal for the first time the scope of the monitoring by its Demographics Unit, now called the Zone Assessment Unit. In the past three years, the unit has filed more than 4,200 reports, or about four per day.

Each report typically describes a clandestine visit to a business or mosque, the ethnicity of the clientele and, in some cases, what conversations the officers overheard. The detectives reported details from more than 200 conversations, or about one a week.

Thomas Galati, the commanding officer of the Intelligence Division, said most of those conversations were used to gauge people’s reactions to overseas events. The AP has previously reported that Demographics detectives were extremely interested in people’s reactions to U.S. drone attacks.

The civil rights lawyers want a federal judge to appoint an outside monitor to oversee the NYPD’s intelligence-gathering operations, which the police department is strongly resisting. Such a monitor, the NYPD says, “would have rippling negative effects with dire consequences.”

David Cohen, the NYPD’s top intelligence official, argued in court documents that he and a battery of lawyers review all investigations. Oversight from outside the department, he said, would make New York a more dangerous place to live.

As evidence that New York was under constant threat of terrorism, he said the suspects in last month’s Boston Marathon bombing were headed to Times Square, where he said they might have carried out an attack deadlier than the one in Boston.

Coupled with other thwarted and aspirational plots against New York in recent years, Cohen said the Boston attack showed “the need for a vibrant intelligence program that uniquely addresses the counterterrorism security equities of New York City.”

Informants such as Rahman were central to Cohen’s effort to identify terrorists before they attacked.

Rahman sent Hoban pictures: Imams. The sign-up list for an Islamic study group. People at rallies and parades. And bags of rice and boxes of Cheerios that his mosque was collecting for the needy.

“This is what they give to each family plus flour, cookies, pudding, and meat,” Rahman wrote.

And he collected phone numbers. One belonged to an elderly neighbor who worked in a woman’s shelter. Two more were people who signed a petition and were “probably organizing a rally” for Muslims suffering in Myanmar.

Rahman collected information on the Muslim student group at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and the non-profit Muslim American Society. Hoban, however, said those groups were never his informant’s focus.

Instead, Hoban said Rahman kept tabs on a small group of people. That effort happened to take him into mosques and student groups, Hoban said.

For instance, he said Rahman went to a Brooklyn youth center run by the Muslim American Society “spontaneously.” Hoban said he found out about it later.

In one text message, however, Rahman said he was heading to Friday prayers.

“Afterwards I might go to the mas center,” he writes, a reference to the center.

“Ok,” Hoban responds, “let me know who is there.”

Article source: http://www.lakeplacidnews.com/page/content.detail/id/319105/NYPD-messages-to-Muslim-informant---Get-pictures-.html?isap=1&nav=5068

John Liu Courts NY’s Muslim Community

John Liu has been gaining momentum with New York’s Muslim community for some time now.

This past year, he’s gone from countless public appearances at mosques and Muslim community centers to a private appearance at the wedding of a prominent community leader’s daughter. Likewise, it’s no secret that Liu has a strong track record of aggressively siding with New York’s Muslim residents about the issues that matter most.

Using popular Arabic phrases such as “Insha’Allah,” (which means “God willing”) and “masjid,” (which means “mosque”), the City Controller raised eyebrows this week when he appeared at a forum dedicated to Muslim-American issues, where Liu went as far as calling the NYPD’s surveillance of Muslims unconstitutional.

“My reading of history says that, you know, America is a place of religious freedom, and in fact many people came here, to America, in the first place, from the very early days of this country, to escape religious persecution,” said Liu. “And so — no offense to you guys here — how can anybody think that it’s OK to surveil or spy on people just because they’re Muslim?”

Similarly, he was the only candidate at the forum openly accusing city agencies of deliberately inconveniencing mosques, and the city’s Muslims residents took notice.

“He’s the only one we have a relationship with,” said Zein Rimawi, vice president of the Arab Muslim American Federation, to the NY Daily News. “Nobody else comes here.”

This past fall, Liu’s attendance at the federation’s 16th annual Ramadan dinner made Rimawi feel bonded to the candidate.

“He’s an immigrant like me,” said Rimawi, a Pakistani-American. “I look at him different than the others.”

“John Liu more than the other candidates has for the past six years or so been extra diligent about going not just to mosques but to churches and synagogues and connecting to their congregations,” John Mollenkopf, a political science professor at the CUNY Graduate Center, told the Daily News.

“You have to identify any pocket of votes you know will disproportionately turn out for you. If there are 50,000 Muslim registered Democrats, and if it’s a low turnout election, maybe only 10% of them vote, but that’s 5,000 votes, and that’s a piece of the puzzle to get you to the magic number,” he added.

Interesting to note is that Liu has also gained force within the Orthodox Jewish community as of late, voicing supported for the ritual of metzitzah b’peh.

This past January, regulations called for by mayor Michael Bloomberg were imposed on the procedure in response to two public instances of newborns contracting the herpes virus during the religious ritual. Specifically, Bloomberg called for the city to require parents to sign consent forms prior to their baby undergoing the oral suctioning technique while Liu spoke against the order.

“For thousands of years, this has been a practice that has been observed by people,” he said. “I’m not in support of the changes that Mayor Bloomberg made. For thousands of years, this has been a practice that has been observed by people. As with most procedures, some risk is inherent. But I would certainly defer to the rabbis on this as opposed to thinking that, well we know better after thousands of years of this practice.”

In a statement to the media, Liu commented that he “has responded to invitations and requests from New Yorkers of all religious faiths and would continue to do so as mayor.”

Share this post


Submit to Delicious

Submit to Digg

Submit to Facebook

Submit to Google Bookmarks

Submit to Stumbleupon

Submit to Technorati

Submit to Twitter

Submit to reddit

Article source: http://jewishvoiceny.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4195:john-liu-courts-nys-muslim-community&catid=112:new-york&Itemid=295

Obama Administration Now Favors Muslim Clerics for Christian American …

Jerry McConnell is a longtime resident of planet earth with one half century on the seacoast of NH.  He is a community activist but promises not to run for President and he feeds ACORN’s to the squirrels.  He can be emailed at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) with complaints or the editor at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) with favorables.

Article source: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/55384

Jihad in America

On the bright, beautiful, and crisp fall day that was early morning, September 11, 2001, few Americans were familiar with stealth jihad, or considered Islamic terrorism a threat to America. Yet, there was a voice crying in the wilderness, warning of a danger that already existed here. That voice belonged to Steven Emerson, whose documentary film titled Jihad in America was aired by PBS on November 21, 1994. Islamic militant groups in America, including CAIR (the Council on American-Islamic Relations) began their protestations and intimidation even before the broadcast date. Since the airing, the use of intimidation has been ramped up and gone global, having a stifling impact on terrorism/jihad-related broadcasts in the mainstream media throughout the Western world. This oppressive atmosphere has affected the conduct of Western governments, including the Obama administration.

Emerson’s newly released Jihad in America: The Grand Deception is a must-watch documentary — an educational tool for Americans to learn about the network of stealth Islamist jihadists in the U.S. that has grown in the aftermath of 9/11. The fact that evil lurks just under the surface in America (brought to life last month at the Boston Marathon) seems to be difficult to acknowledge, yet ignoring it is at our peril. Unfortunately, Americans have a short memory span, and most prefer to turn away from unpleasant realities, especially in the Obama Age. Hence, all the more reason to circulate information about this essential documentary.

The 70-minute documentary by Steven Emerson’s Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) deals with the covert structure and growing influence of the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan al-Muslimun) and other such radical Muslim groups, masquerading under the deceitful moniker of apolitical religious groups, as well as civil rights groups in the U.S. This IPT documentary reveals how the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) has infiltrated the highest institutions of the land, including the Obama White House, the U.S. Congress, U.S. Departments of State and Homeland Security, Hollywood, the mainstream media, law enforcement in various states, the publishing industry and American museums. The film not only presents examples of MB infiltration, but reveals how the MB and its affiliates intimidate policymakers to submit to their demands by their use of our open democracy to undermine our institutions, all of which is done to further their quest for global rule under Sharia law.

This film includes previously unseen interviews with articulate and most courageous Muslim individuals, former FBI agents and federal prosecutors, a prominent Hollywood director, journalists, as well as a top official of the Muslim Brotherhood. This documentary features secretly recorded audio and video speeches of radical Islamists, including individual preachers and groups, original MB documents, and unsealed federal documents.

In an interview Steven Emerson had with Lou Dobbs of Fox News on January 21, 2013, the host introduced The Grand Deception as follows: “Our guest [Steven Emerson] says that the ‘Muslim Brotherhood and other radical Islamist off shoots are hiding in plain sight right here in the U.S.’” What followed is Emerson’s explanation of the documentary title. “A group of Muslim Brotherhood activists secretly got together in Philadelphia in 1993 in a meeting that was actually wiretapped [the wiretaps have since been declassified] by the FBI. They [the MB activists] openly talked about deception as the primary campaign tactic that they would use to change the image of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. by creating new front groups, by changing the terminology, and by claiming they were against terrorism publicly, but in fact raising funds for Hamas privately. The word deception is the word that I used in the title because that is exactly what is going on throughout the country with these radical Islamic groups.”

One of the radical Islamists the documentary presents is a Brooklyn, NY-based Imam named Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, who, according to Emerson, had been invited in 1991 to give an invocation to the U.S. Congress (the first Muslim to so) and would subsequently be recorded saying about the U.S., “You know what this country is? It is a garbage can, it is filthy and sick.” The film also points out that this anti-American, hate-spewing Imam, was invited to appear at anti-terrorism conferences and was paid by the U.S. government.

Muslim Brotherhood victories in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya have provided encouragement for the hundreds of MB cells worldwide, including those in the U.S.

The film shows Attorney General Eric Holder undergoing congressional drilling in 2010 from Rep. Lamar Smith, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, on how he refused to acknowledge the role of radical Muslims in terrorism on American soil and refused to use the words “radical Muslim” or “Muslim.”

In another frame of the film, Dr. Mamoun Fandy, an Egyptian-born American scholar, President of the Fandy Associates think tank and a senior fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace, declared that the MB is the “mother” of all radical Muslim groups. He pointed out that “instead of isolating the MB, the West and the U.S. [especially under President Obama] have engaged them and regarded them as “moderate.” According to Fandy, the West was tremendously naïve about the nature and intentions of the MB. According to Emerson (in conversation with this writer), Fandy was let go by Georgetown University because of his views on the MB.

The film records the spiritual leader of the MB, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, speaking to a Muslim audience in Toledo, OH and revealing the goals of the MB. “We will conquer Europe and we will conquer America for Islam through religious proselytization” (dawa in Arabic). MB documents captured by the FBI in 1991 further reveal this insidious plan by the MB to conquer America for Islam. It includes increased immigration and settlement as part of the MB’s plot of stealth Jihad, just as they have done in Europe. Their aim is to destroy Western civilization from within by destabilizing “their miserable house,” and replacing it with God’s religion — Islam.

Others in the film include Kamal Helbawy, an MB leader who is quoted as saying “Anything mentioned in the Quran, we believe 100%.” Amir Abdel Malik Ali is shown addressing a Muslim Student Association event at UCLA in 2011, shouting “I will die to establish Islam in America,” and Dr. Zudhi Jasser, founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD), who, in an interview with Emerson, pointed out that “for Islamists like the MB their utopia is establishing Sharia [Islamic law] rule in America.”

Following the airing of the film, Hussam Ayloush, executive director of CAIR in Los Angeles, accused Emerson of stirring up anti-Muslim feelings. Ayloush employed the typical tactic used by Muslims when caught with the ugly truth about Islamists’ goals in the West. The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) has been calling for a ban on what they consider “Islamophobia,” which is nothing less than an attempt to kill free speech. The Obama administration has, however, concurred with the OIC and has banned references to Muslim or Islamic terrorism. Emerson has challenged CAIR’s Ayloush to an open debate to discuss the facts featured in the film. To date, there has been no response from Ayloush.

This reporter asked Emerson for a conclusive remark on Jihad in America: The Grand Deception. Emerson expressed disappointment at the lack of outrage on the part of the major media and cable TV networks to the collusion between the U.S. government (the Obama administration) and the Muslim Brotherhood. He said that the TV networks refused to show his film. Emerson is nevertheless optimistic that the truth he has revealed about the Muslim Brotherhood deep penetration into the highest echelons of the U.S. government and society will be become widely known in spite of the media and government obstructions.

For all Americans, Jihad in America -The Grand Deception is a must see.

By Joseph Puder
Frontpage Magazine

Article source: http://www.aina.org/news/20130521123420.htm

Texas Mega-Church Welcomes Islamists to ‘Global Faith Forum’

indexThe 3,000-member NorthWood Church of Keller, T.X. is holding a “Global Faith Forum” in November. In yet another Islamist-attended interfaith event, Christians will hear from a former Saudi intelligence chief, a former director-general of Al-Jazeera, officials from U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entities and the non-Muslims who embrace them.

Pastor Bob Roberts. Jr. is known for his efforts to build-bridges with Muslims. He spoke at the “Christ at the Checkpoint” conference put together by Palestinian Christians at Bethlehem Bible College. So did Florida Pastor Joel C. Hunter, who has been negative attention for his association with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity. Hunter is also critical of “Christian Zionists.”

An article posted on Hunter’s website reports how the “Christ at the Checkpoint” audience, including students from Wheaton and Eastern Universities, “were moved by the testimony of Palestinian men and women who shared the pain and suffering they experience on a daily basis caused primarily by the continuing occupation.”

Pastor Roberts reacted to the anti-Islam Innocence of Muslims video by suggesting that governments crack down on its distribution. He said, “There is a ‘clear and present’ danger the U.S. courts have ruled in regard to freedom of speech—I think that has to extend globally.”

In January, NorthWood Church hosted Azhar Azeez, Vice President of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). ISNA is an unindicted co-conspirator in a major terrorism-financing trial. Federal prosecutors labeled ISNA a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity, a fact confirmed by the Brotherhood’s own secret documents.

In November, his church’s Global Faith Forum will bring the spotlight to his interfaith efforts and those involved in them. Event speakers include Rep. Kay Graner (R-TX), former South Carolina Governor David Beasley and Christianity Today editor Mark Galli, but they aren’t the main attractions.

The conference website’s home page proudly advertises Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the U.S. from 2005 to 2007, as a main speaker. Before that, he was the Saudi foreign intelligence chief from 1977 to 2001, making him a top figure in Saudi Arabia’s proliferation of Wahhabism around the world for over 20 years. He represented a Sharia-based government that persecutes Christians.

Faisal Bin Muammar was an advisor at the Saudi Royal Court and Secretary-General of the Riyadh-based King Abdul Aziz Center for National Dialogue.

Safi Kaskas is a co-founder of East West University in Chicago and a “strategy consultant for a number of business organizations in the USA and Saudi Arabia.” He is a member of the Association of Muslim Social Scientists. A 1991 U.S. Muslim Brotherhood memo identifies AMSS as one of “our organizations and the organizations of our friends.” The memo says its “work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.” The AMSS is also closely linked to the International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Another main speaker is Professor John Esposito, one of the top non-Muslim supporters of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood network. He is a frequent guest speaker at their events and was a witness for the defense in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation.

The aforementioned Azhar Azeez is again speaking. He is the Vice President of ISNA and has been on its Executive Council since 2002. He is also the senior National Director of Islamic Relief USA, a charity linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Wadah Khanfar was the director-general of Al-Jazeera from 2006 to 2011. Al-Jazeera’s extremism is well-documented. The Arabic station even gives Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yousef al-Qaradawi a weekly show.

Ayatollah Ahmad Iravani is President of the Center for the Study of Islam and the Middle East. He’s also been a teacher for 10 years at the Catholic University of America. He graduated from Qom, Iran and has taught Sharia Law in Tehran. He’s also participated in Catholic-Muslim dialogues called “A Common Word” that includes allies of Qaradawi.

Imam Zia ul Haque Sheikh is a member of the North American Imams Federation. Radical imam Siraj Wahhaj has served on the Board of Trustees. Its website lists Ashrafuz Zaman Khan as its President. Bangladesh has charged him with war crimes from his days in the Islamist group Jamaat-e-Islami.

Dahlia Mogahed is from the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies and is a friend of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entities. In 2008, she said that CAIR and ISNA were designated as unindicted co-conspirators by the federal government in order “to silence, you know, institution-building among Muslims. And the way o do it is [to] malign these groups. And it’s kind of a witch hunt.”

Suhail Khan is a former Bush Administration official and Senior Fellow for Christian-Muslim Understanding at the Institute for Global Engagement. He has been accused of helping U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entities gain influence in the Bush Administration after 9/11 and of having Brotherhood ties himself. He denies that the Muslim Brotherhood even exists in America.

Rev. Jack Sara is President of Bethlehem Bible College and Pastor with the Evangelical Alliance Church in the Holy Land. The College put together the “Christ at the Checkpoint” conference and has a long relatonship with Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding.

It wouldn’t be surprising if Pastor Roberts didn’t know who he was dealing with. After all, he cited Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yousef al-Qaradawi as a “key Islamic leader” condemning anti-American violence. The desire for interfaith credentials seems to surpass the desire to have a standard.

This article was sponsored by the Institute on Religion and Democracy.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Article source: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/texas-mega-church-welcomes-islamists-to-global-faith-forum/

Muslims and the War on Terror

A tipoff from a prominent Toronto imam more than a year ago appears to be at the heart of arrests at the end of April in the alleged VIA Rail terror plot in Canada. In fact, counterterrorism police began their press briefing by thanking Muslim leaders.

Even in the Boston marathon tragedy, national and local Muslim organizations have condemned the bombings. The largest Muslim civil rights group in the country, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, even asked Muslims to offer authorities any leads that they may have.

Moreover, in an interesting twist, mosques refused to arrange Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s janaza (Islamic funeral prayers). In fact, a number of fatwas (religious opinions) have been issued recommending that prominent individuals and imams not lead his janaza. Imam Suhaib Webb, a nationally recognized cleric from Boston, said ”I don’t think I could ethically lead a prayer for him, but I would not stop people from praying upon him.” The intent behind this is to send a clear message to potential terrorists.

 Despite such proactive measures, some self-proclaimed experts continue to pin collective blame on Muslims, citing the “radicalization” of the community. In fact, some Islamophobes who have the ear of governments both side of the border have had the audacity to claim that 80 per cent of the mosques in are controlled by radical imams and serve as incubators of “homegrown” terrorists.

There is no credible evidence to support such bald assertions. On the contrary, the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security at Duke University released a study in February titled “Muslim-American Terrorism: Declining Further,” which concluded that Muslim terrorism was not a significant threat. It had claimed 33 lives since Sept. 11, 2001, compared with 200 victims of far-right terrorists and 180,000 murders.  The Center has also documented the active role of Muslims in combating terror in the U.S. The same can be said for Canada.

Moreover, as national security reporter Spencer Ackerman notes, “In just the past year, the mass shootings that have captivated America’s attention killed 66 Americans.” This is twice the number from Muslim-American terrorism in the 11 years after 9/11 leading up to the Boston tragedy.

 Muslims must not be held collectively responsible for the alleged actions of criminals among them. No other community is put in such an unenviable position. Italians are not asked to condemn the actions of the Mafia, nor were the Irish asked to apologize for the actions of the Irish Republican Army. The general public is not expected to take responsibility for the actions of the criminals who vandalized mosques and discriminated against or attacked Muslims since the tragic events of Sept. 11. In fact, the FBI has documented a dramatic spike in anti-Muslim hate and this cannot be pinned on the average American.

The vast majority of Muslims condemn terrorism because even classical Islamic law explicitly classifieshirabah (terrorism) as a serious sin. In fact, indiscriminate killing and attacks are prohibited. Indeed, the Qur’an (6:151) proclaims: “Anyone who kills a person (except pursuant to law) it is as if he has killed the whole of humanity.”

Moreover, the Prophet Mohammed’s strict rules of engagement even in times of hostility were blunt: “Do not kill women or children or non-combatants.” Such nuances are lost on those with limited knowledge of their religion. Indeed, a 2010 United States Institute for Peace study titled ‘Why Youth Join al-Qaeda’ of more than 2,000 people who were attracted to terrorism confirms this. Colonel John Matt Venhaus, the author of the report, found that most of these youth “have an inadequate understanding of their own religion, which makes them vulnerable to misinterpretations of the religious doctrine.”

Muslims wonder why they must keep distancing themselves from something so antithetical to their worldview. Even when they disown such conduct, it is under-reported or dismissed as a PR exercise. That said, as part of a democratic civil society the Muslim community has a duty to the mainstream to address the perception real or imagined, about the extremists within.

To its credit, the community has risen to the challenge. Many imams and scholars openly challenge jihadist ideology. From my legal and activism experience on both sides of the border over the years, numerous individuals and institutions have organized anti-radicalization events and even worked with counterterrorism officials in the interest of our collective security.

As part of the same civil society, our governments also must do their part.

First, we must re-examine our foreign policy and its consequences. It is high time to acknowledge that all innocent lives lost, whether to terrorists or to the “war on terror,” are equally deplorable. Victims do not appreciate the difference between a pressure-cooker bomb and a drone strike. Disagree with their tactics as you may, it is undeniable that there are many in the world who have legitimate grievances against our foreign policy, some of whom may allow anger to overshadow religious rules of engagement.

Moreover, Washington’s drone policy has only contributed to greater distrust in both the global and domestic arena. As Farea Al-Muslimi, a Yemeni writer, testified about a drone strike against his village just before the April 23rd Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearings into the issue, “the drone strike and its impact tore my heart, much as the tragic bombings in Boston last week tore your hearts and also mine.” He described the blowback from such attacks.

Second, at the domestic level, both of our governments have been on an undeclared and possibly unintended witchhunt. Muslim charities are unfairly targeted, Islam and its symbols are unnecessarily made into an issue and intelligence harassment is rampant. Terrorist profiling often is based simply on guilt by association, which just adds to the vicious cycle of marginalization, distrust and blowback.

In the U.S., between 2010 and 2012, lawmakers in 32 states introduced bills to ban Islamic law, and seven states – Oklahoma, Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, South Dakota, Idaho, and Tennessee — enacted such bills into law. As many commentators have documented, these bills are essentially a solution looking for a problem. In fact, these laws may have even created additional challenges for some women who sought to advance their rights. Department of Justice (DOJ) figures also suggest [PDF] that anti-Muslim “zoning bias,” where towns refuse to grant building permits for mosques, is a growing problem.

In the Canadian context, some have questioned the timing of the arrests (especially given that there was no imminent threat), which appears planned to push through The Combating Terrorism Act that would revive some provisions of Canada’s Anti-terrorism Act which had “sunsetted” after a five-year period. The bill, passed two days after the arrests, revived two draconian provisions that had expired: preventive detention for three days without charges and “investigative hearings” under which a suspect who refuses to testify before a judge could be imprisoned for up to a year, as well as new restrictions on travel.

Third, government officials must be careful not to alienate the community by seeking advice only from those with an anti-Muslim agenda. Too many hawks and Islamophobes have the ear of both administrations.

Fourth, the accused must be given their day in court in a fair, open and transparent manner. The trust and confidence asked of the community must not be squandered by resorting to the secret hearings and secret evidence provisions of the anti-terror legislation. Any attempt to deny due process and the rule of law will certainly have an impact on co-operation.

Finally, it must be understood that the majority of Muslims, who are neither secular nor ultra-orthodox, hold the key to any serious and productive bridge-building. If government agencies believe they can win the “war on terror” by undermining front-line soldiers, they had better think again.

 

Faisal Kutty is an assistant professor of law at Valparaiso University Law School in Indiana and serves as an adjunct professor of law at Osgoode Hall Law School of York University in Toronto. He previously served as vice-chair and legal counsel to the Canadian Counsel on American Islamic Relations (CAIR-CAN). Follow him at Twitter@FaisalKutty

 

Article source: http://rabble.ca/news/2013/05/muslims-and-war-on-terror